Neutrality

Myself as an engineer assumes the stance of neutrality for very obvious reasons. As myself trades neurogenetic material in the shape of human intellect in order to amplify my understandings within neuromechanical principles, myself for the sake of efficiency assumes said neutrality.

While the mainstream idea is that of bias, myself do have my personal biases just like anyone else. But those are necessary to overcome in order to without prejudice (which is neuromechanical retardation) acquire the greatest amount of neurogenetic material, or mental structures, as to say mind matter.

While of course people will with their prejudice (retardation) assume my adherence to this or that, my actual stance as a behavioural engineer is neutrality. This is partial to my own choice and decision to not partake in political activity at all.

Some people are offended by my apparent connection to the Russian entity – but my neutrality in functional expressions remains the same as myself refuse to take a side in any conflict.

But as myself have traded mind matter quite extensively with Russia through studies of their language, culture and customs, myself is more familiar with their entity. It is therefore inevitable that recent events hits ‘closer to home’.

Just like it would hurt you more if the people at one of your favourite stores were attacked, more than if a random store you have never paid any attention to were attacked. This was also a detestable attack exclusively targeting civilians, among which some were younglings.

Myself also have a slight genetic inheritance from them.
But in that context my loyalty towards the Kingdom of Sweden is not ever in question as a neutral citizen who operates as a scientific observer and engineer.

Myself is bothered by the notion that myself must assume a specific side or belonging. Myself does not operate in that way, as it severely affects the efficiency with which myself can perform.
Forcing a person to pick a side is an anti-democratic behaviour and also illegal according to most jurisdictions.

In any question regarding my attempted neutrality as a neurogenetic trader, myself willingly, consciously and by choice assume repeatedly mentioned neutrality.

If it is complicated, let me summarise in a short brief dialogue:

“So Thius, which side are you on?”
– “Myself is on nobody’s side – with nobody, against nobody”
“But you must pick a side!”
– “Then myself pick God’s side, and God’s children are dying everywhere because of people like you, now shut the fuck up!”

Published
Categorised as Thoughts