In my human life there are a couple of standards which myself operates after in accordance with the understandings myself have acquired in genetic integrity as a behavioural scientist.
Which are as follows:
1: No murder
2: No stealing
3: No coveting
4: No lying
5: No judging
While at first glance, these appears to be very similar to those guidelines provided by several doctrines such as religions – they are actually principles which creates genetic integrity. As expressed behaviour is the way in which one shapes one’s genetic code over time.
While myself do the very best to adhere to all of these principles, myself is fully and totally committed to ‘no murder‘ and ‘no lying‘. The first is simply because it is a promise myself made to Helios/Christ. Therefore it is something myself cannot cut corners on. It is in alignment with the claim that ‘one should not kill‘, but it also have to do with the genetic integrity that comes from it. As genetic oscillation and genetic causality are facts, no output of excessive destruction diminishes the risk of excessive destruction in input.
Furthermore, myself is completely committed to not lying. While this does not mean that myself will always be correct, it means that myself do not intentionally pass on information that myself knows is incorrect. Myself might be wrong in a lot of my assumptions, but would honestly admit so if that were to be the case. This has to do with scientific accuracy and my ability to trust myself. You know if you lie, you witness yourself lying if you lie, and therefore subconsciously you will know that you cannot be trusted, even if your ego thinks so.
Myself struggles with ‘no stealing‘ as it is hard to realise the fullest extent of. For example, if someone offers an idea, which myself finds useful, then is that inspiration or theft if myself were to incorporate the essence of the idea in my own progression. In the greater context of things in my mature life myself does not really thieve, so the rest is more a subject of philosophy. But myself would assume myself not flawless as myself might download stuff for personal use which is also a question for debate in the context.
Myself have not coveted much in my life. For reasons myself do not really understand myself, myself have a really hard time to become jealous. Myself have never really coveted other people’s things (Other than in the jokes when myself covets their wives – but myself will admit honestly that it is mostly just jokes)
The hardest one is without a doubt ‘no judging‘ which also incorporates prejudice. It is very hard not to judge and simply turn the other cheek. It is very hard to not jump conclusions about people and assume things before one has all the facts or fully developed knowledge.
The reason myself do this, has very little to do with doctrines or religion. But actually genetic principles which shapes homeostatic integrity, of both the mind and the body. Because they are principles of behaviour, and behaviour is what shapes our standard of character.
As myself assume an exceptionally high standard of character, myself is passionately committed. Simply because it helps me shape a mind-body that more easily can handle the events of life without losing its cool. As they are principles they are not really rules. Meaning, they shape standard in behaviour, the more one commits, the greater the standard.
People talk about an operational standard of about 80/20, which to myself as an engineer is preposterous. It is equivalent to being buttraped by murphy one time out of five. Myself therefore assumes a much higher standard. In the ‘no murder‘ and ‘no lying‘ myself assumes a standard of 99.9999/0.0001, where the former is success and the latter is failure. In the other ones myself attempts to reach a standard of 99.99/0.01.
This means that flawless ‘veganism‘ (Which is just a contemporary mouth-noise for agreeing with the ‘thou shalt not kill‘) is an absolutely given. Not just in food, but any product myself would use in the totality of my life.
This has nothing to do with any agendas nor adherence to doctrines. This all builds on my knowledge as a behavioural scientist and neuromechanical engineer. As such standard is the expressive proof of ones efficient sophistication and novelty as an animated lifeform.
Myself do not believe that in the doctrines and religions where the supposed behavioural principles were given has much to do with some supreme deity judging one’s steps, but more to do with the shaping of homeostatic integrity which translates to one’s ability to enjoy life – individually and collectively.
Myself do not really judge the standard of other people other than in my art, but it is done quite mindfully so as to not single ordinary civilian individuals out or bother public figures too much.
All of this is because myself deems it a substandard in myself as a human being. It is quite hard to assume such a standard and balance it in-between the everyday life of myself as well as other life-forms and also as an expressive artist. Especially since myself do not believe in censoring in order to make the undertakings easier.
In metaphor to myself it is like playing a videogame, only that it is real life. Every temptation or problem that opposes those principles of behavioural integrity is a challenge presented to overcome. The experience from this progress is what helps to shape the character of oneself, and the standard with which oneself is operating the process of life as we currently know it.
Despite any expressions in my art, these are non-negotiable facts of neuromechanics to myself.
